“Nevada’s state government website has leaked the personal data on over 11,700 applicants for dispensing medical marijuana in the state.”
The data includes Name, Social Security Number, height, weight, eye color and driver’s license. Along with street address and phone numbers.
If you want to steal someone’s identity, the state in it’s nearly infinite incompetence, has just handed you everything short of a birth certificate.
They’ve taken the site offline and there’s no telling when it will be restored, but the state of Nevada has yet to explain why the Hell such sensitive was available on such a poorly secured server. And why did they put it on the same server as the mundane data.
The state of Maryland, decriminalized cannabis possession in 2014, allowing an individual to possess up to 10 grams with only minor civil penalties. Yet the police in Maryland still use the smell of the drug as the basis for searching vehicles.
The Maryland Court of Appeals recently heard arguments on the legality of intrusive searches based solely on the aroma of marijuana.
“The smell alone does not give rise to suspect a person is in possession of 10 grams or more of marijuana,” attorney Ethan Frenchman told the court in his opening arguments. But the state’s attorney insisted that it was.
The appeal stems from three recent cases in which police officers smelled marijuana and cited it as probable cause to search vehicles where more drugs were found. The practice was upheld by trial courts and the Maryland Court of Special Appeals.
In this latest appeal the court debated “The aromatic potency of fresh marijuana versus that of burnt marijuana and the relationship between the amount of marijuana at the source of the smell and the resultant distance at which the smell might be detected.”
The problem stems from the fact that the lawmakers decriminalized possession, but they did not legalize it.
Some friends of mine have been fighting the state of Nevada for a license ever since medical marijuana was legalized. They more than meet the requirements, but the state in it’s infinite wisdom –providing having their heads so far up their asses that they have to yawn to see where they’re going counts as wisdom– hired inspectors based on the friends and family plan.
These people had no knowledge of the subject at hand and zero oversight, so they could make their decisions based on whatever they felt like making up.
So my friends sued and won a reevaluation, my friends then got gigged for, among other things, not supplying plans for the proposed building. -The only trouble is that the building is a pre-existing structure. The bloody thing has been there for years.
Some other fool mumbled about it not being secure enough. Well sure, everybody knows how insecure cement and re-bar reinforced block walls are. Please ignore the fact that banks are built that way. –Once again this state sponsored vendetta is taking it’s toll.
The way I see it, the state of Nevada is just like a lot of other states in that there are no repercussions for anything they decide. There’s no oversight, no responsibility and is run by a bunch of petty empire builders who throw a five year old’s temper tantrum every time somebody questions their decisions knowing
Isn’t it strange that certain movers and shakers got their licenses without a problem, whether they met the requirements or not?
I’m not even a little bit surprised. I grew up here and know from experience that crooked politician is redundant. If my friends would have hung out with the local power brokers they wouldn’t have these problems, but that’s just not who the are.
So it’s back to court for them next March. After that I’m sure they’ll have to sue the state of Nevada.
I can’t see any way to recoup the money they’ve spent trying to force Nevada to do what’s right under the law, but by now it’s personal enough that they’re going to sue just to get justice and they have deep enough pockets to do do it.
The DEA folded under pressure and has withdrawn the placement of Kratom as a schedule one drug.
Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) is tree growing up to 80 feet tall that is native to large areas of south-east-Asia. The leaves are used for everything from a natural sedative to a way of increasing energy, appetite, and sexual desire.
They announced it in a post in the federal registerwithdrawal-of-notice-of-intent-to-temporarily-place-mitragynine-and-7-hydroxymitragynine into Schedule I.
The reversal from the DEA comes amid massive pressure to stop the ban, including a WhiteHouse.org petition which received over 140,000 signatures in a 30-day period (over 100,000 of which came in the first few days).
In the UK, in spite of contradicting the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 scheduling of cannabis as having no medicinal value, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency has decided that CBDs are in fact medicinal.
This is from Volteface magazine:
On Monday cannabidiol (CBD) producers and distributors in the UK started to receive letters from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) demanding that they cease to sell, supply, promote, advertise or process orders for CBD products within 28 days. The letters stated that CBD now satisfies the definition of a medicinal product. The revised definition will leave UK patients with no legal access to CBD.
Officials with the MHRA released the following statement today, Oct. 7:
“We have come to the opinion that products containing cannabidiol (CBD) are a medicine. Products for therapeutic use must have a medicines’ license before they can be legally sold or supplied in the UK. Products will have to meet safety, quality and effectiveness standards to protect public health.
“If you use CBD and if you have any questions, speak to your GP or other healthcare professional.
“We have written to UK CBD stockists and manufacturers to inform them of our view. These products will require a marketing authorization to be granted before they can be legally sold, supplied or anywhere advertised in the UK.
“We can provide regulatory guidance to any company who may wish to apply for a license.”
Well the advocates want to treat MMJ as medicine, so there ya go… It’s medicine.
Mutual of Omaha informed Derek Peterson, CEO of Terra Tech Corp., in a letter dated June 13 that “we cannot accept premiums from individuals or entities who are associated with the marijuana industry.”
Julie Hill, a financial industry expert at the University of Alabama School of Law, says she believes the company may have concern about violating laws against money laundering.
“These and other laws make it very risky to accept any money that you know comes from a marijuana business, regardless of whether you are a bank,” she says. Among the prohibitions are “knowingly engag[ing] in a monetary transaction in criminally derived property of value greater than $10,000.”
“This is one account that probably won’t make them much money, yet it could potentially be a really large headache,” she says. “It’s easier to say ‘No, thank you’ than to try to figure out if it would actually cause negative repercussions.”
The phrase “knowingly engaging in a monetary transaction in criminally derived property of value greater than $10,000.” is why banks won’t touch the marijuana industry regardless of it’s legal status in any given state.
It seems like everybody’s running scared from a bunch of delusional losers who think prohibition was a success. –Well, change is coming; it’s just moving at the speed of glaciers.
Health Canada announced Friday that it is proposing new regulations to allow access to prescription heroin under its Special Access Program (SAP). That program allows for emergency access to health drugs for serious or life-threatening conditions when conventional treatments have failed or are unsuitable.
“A significant body of scientific evidence supports the medical use of diacetylmorphine, also known as pharmaceutical-grade heroin, for the treatment of chronic, relapsing opioid dependence. Diacetylmorphine is permitted in a number of other jurisdictions, such as Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Switzerland, to support a small percentage of patients who have not responded to other treatment options, such as methadone and buprenorphine,” the statement said.
While the proposed amendment would enable the careful consideration by the SAP of applications for diacetylmorphine in exceptional cases, all the other stringent controls in the Narcotics Control Regulations will continue to apply.
According to the Cannabist:
Organizers of Denver’s annual 420 Rally said they will not be refunding tickets for the event, which was postponed Saturday morning because of wet, snowy weather.
More information about rescheduling the rally, slotted to start at 10 a.m., will be coming later, said Miguel Lopez, the rally’s organizer who insisted on Friday that the show would go on rain or shine.
“We’re rescheduling due to bad weather and issues beyond our control,” he said Saturday, unwilling to provide specific details that factored into the postponement.
On a personal note:
When I want to celebrate 420 I do not want to do it on 423. And what about those people who took time off from work? I guess they don’t matter, at least not to the people making a buck off this rally. 🙁
From the Marijuana Business Daily:
In Denver Colorado, General Mills is grabbing up billboards to advertise junk food in preparation for Wednesday’s 4/20 pot holiday, with slogans like “420 is better on pizza rolls” and “Stock Up B4/20.”
But at the same time, marijuana businesses in Colorado are prohibited from advertising their product. The reasoning seems to be that one product can be purchased at any grocery store while the other is restricted.
Policy analyst Andrew Livingston says that under Colorado law “The only big public billboard or sign that you can have under state law is the one on your zoned lot.”
He also said that for plant-touching companies such as retailers or edibles makers that want to advertise in print or online, he said, the bar is that the company must be ready to present “reliable evidence” that no more than 30% of that outlet’s audience is under 21 years old.
Well, nobody has ever used the word sensible in reference to marijuana regs.
The US Supreme Court refused to hear the lawsuit filed by Nebraska and Oklahoma against the legalization of marijuana in Colorado.
The plaintiffs claimed the law in Colorado placed an unfair burden on their law enforcement resources.
From Common Dreams:
WASHINGTON – Today, the United States Supreme Court declined to hear the case brought by Nebraska and Oklahoma against Colorado over its marijuana legalization law. Oklahoma and Nebraska had claimed the Colorado law had created an increased law enforcement burden in neighboring states. The suit, filed by Nebraska Attorney General John Bruning and Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, claimed that federal marijuana prohibition preempts the law that Colorado voters decisively adopted in 2012. The Federal Government filed a brief urging the high court to reject the case.
While people I know are celebrating I’m wondering how long it will take to go through the lower courts, and will the justices be willing to make a decision that could well affect federal law, in addition to all state laws.